Tag Archives: utilities

Turnaround Management

Disciplined governance, clear accountability, and early leadership alignment are the real differentiators in effective turnaround management (TAR). From establishing a TAR Steering Team in advance to enforcing scope control, freeze dates, and decision authority, his approach reflects time-tested practices that consistently deliver safer, on-schedule, and on-budget outcomes.

Effective turnaround management (TAR) begins with strong governance and clear accountability, anchored by the formation of a TAR Steering Team and the appointment of a clearly defined TAR Manager. This structure establishes ownership, decision authority, and alignment across operations, maintenance, engineering, and support functions to ensure disciplined execution of the turnaround. The following are best practices regarding turnaround management:

The TAR Manager’s role is:

    • Acts as chair and facilitator of the TAR Steering Team, with the operations manager as the client and the maintenance and engineering managers as key members. Other members include senior site managers responsible for HSE, inspection, capital projects, procurement, and finance.
    • Responsible for the safety, quality, schedule, and overall cost of the TAR. The TAR Manager also has the duty to control manpower levels to ensure that the TAR is properly staffed. All efforts for the TAR associated with operations preparedness, capital and maintenance expense activities should be combined under the control of the TAR Manager.
    • Takes the lead in developing the TAR premise document, which provides the overall purpose, objectives, and constraints for performing the TAR. It should clearly establish the specific business, operational and execution criteria against which all potential scope items are evaluated to determine whether they should be included.

A TAR Steering Team should be established to keep the turnaround on schedule, on budget, and aligned with established operating practices. The TAR Steering Team should be in place at least 24 months prior to each major (high complexity) TAR event, which means it may be a permanent team if you have major TAR events every year or two. The key responsibilities of the TAR Steering Team are as follows:

    • Set and communicate the TAR priorities to the entire site: safety, quality, duration, and cost, in that order.
    • Establish and document a premise that aligns to the business needs and principles of the facility.
    • Understand the TAR process and demand discipline to it by all plant and support functions.
    • Act on threats to achieving the TAR objectives.
    • Control the scope and scope growth.
    • Track preparation progress and correct promptly.
    • Ensure the TAR Manager is supported with strategic planning, financial control and reporting, well managed TAR related capital projects, problem resolution, work scope policy, project milestones and freeze dates, communications, TAR calendar changes, and compliance to all established policies. This is important as I have seen TAR Managers sink due to the lack of support in some or all these areas.
    • Monitor cost and duration forecast relative to budget and act on variances.
    • Monitor environment for potential impacts on turnaround (e.g., business conditions, company-wide production needs, plant performance, corporate requirements, and initiatives, etc.) and act, as necessary.
    • Regular communication of key points to the entire site.

The following reflects methods consistently used in well-executed TAR management efforts:

    • The TAR Manager and the TAR Steering Team should write a work scope development policy prior to the compilation of the initial worklist. This should normally be in place at least 18 months prior to the TAR and act as reference for scope development. The policy should consider all maintenance, capital and inspection work necessary to enable the unit to safely operate to the next planned turnaround. Always look forward to two TARs when planning for the next TAR as you do not want to miss required scope that will need a shutdown between the next two TARs. Only doing essential work is key as any added scope increases the complexity exponentially and lowers your chances of success.
    • Strictly adhere to your milestones including the TAR start dates unless there is an overwhelming business reason to changing it. I have seen senior VPs trying to change the start dates based on short term market conditions and downplay the costs related to loss of momentum, keeping the contractors and expensive hired equipment such as cranes on standby or losing specialist contractors to scheduled work at another facility. Spend time preparing your case and ensure it is clear.
    • A freeze date should be established for all capital and expense work and strictly adhered to. For major (high complexity) TARs I recommend using 14 months. This date is an important control policy that allows for adequate planning and procurement of needed material and equipment. All staff associated with the TAR should fully acknowledge that date. Any work requested after the date must be reviewed and approved through a work request approval process, ideally by the TAR Steering Team. Approving work after the freeze date will also increase the complexity exponentially and lowers your chances of success as it will strain your planning process and may even affect the quality, duration, and cost. I have seen engineers risk assess and easily justify the approval of work requested past the freeze date, which is why this needs to be elevated to the TAR Steering Team so they can assess the true impact to the site. Be strict in this area.

Contact [email protected] to discuss your project.

Share this post

Controlling & Reducing Process Leaks

Corroded industrial pipe connection showing metal deterioration and process leak damage
Corroded industrial pipe connection showing metal deterioration and process leak damage

Process leaks are not just maintenance issues—they’re safety, environmental, and operational risks that can cost millions. 

Upload Image...

Process leaks are a persistent and costly challenge in industrial facilities, posing serious safety, environmental, and operational risks. These tips are designed to help facility leaders and engineers strengthen their asset integrity programs and prevent avoidable incidents. Proactive maintenance, structured planning, and leadership engagement are key to achieving lasting leak reduction.

Drawing from real-world experience, the following are practical, actionable strategies to reduce and control leaks in your plant:

    • Have a sitewide policy of no overdue inspections. It can get out of hand if you do not control this. I have been assigned to process facilities to bring this under control; it was costly, and we developed bad leaks along the way. I strongly recommend you stay on top of this.
    • Have a dedicated leak reduction plan, including monthly or bi-weekly meetings with the site leadership to review progress on inspection, finds and repairs; leak metrics; trends; and root causes. This focuses the site on the real target: leak reduction. Track inspectable process leaks and fires (i.e., where damage could have been detected with inspection methods prior to developing a leak) and use as both leading and lagging indicators.
    • Establish a dedicated team that will be responsible for proactively addressing signs of deterioration as they arise. This team should regularly monitor the site while carrying out planned tasks. Limit repairs to coatings, greasing, or simple insulation fixes. More extensive repairs should adhere to the permit and planning process.
    • Your asset integrity program should be accelerating fabric maintenance (insulation and painting) and integrity repairs. If you are not fixing these, corrosion will get ahead of you.
    • Address deadlegs and faulty valves. Stay on top of this as this is a typical miss in hazard and operability studies (HAZOPs) and risk-based inspection (RBI) studies, resulting in unexpected leaks.
    • Have and manage a pigging program for your underground cross-country pipelines. This is key as some of these tend to go through public land and you do not want this type of attention.
    • Keep a list of your top 10, top 50 or top 100 corrosion & cracking concerns. And revisit them with some frequency, I suggest quarterly. This feeds and keeps your corrosion control documents up to date.
    • Understand and manage your injection points. Several major incidents in the process industry have resulted from the poor management of injection points.
    • Have temporary repair management procedures, philosophies, and metrics. This includes how many temporary clamps you have and how many you are removing per month. Don’t let them become overdue. I have witnessed this situation escalate at some sites, with numerous temporary clamps remaining well past their expiration date and several notable leaks occurring at those locations. It took time and a lot of money to bring this under control.
    • Leaks and potential integrity threats on pressurized equipment may be effectively mitigated using temporary repairs to be decided on by the responsible area mechanical engineer in agreement and supported by the operations supervisor and unit inspector. These individuals must conduct a risk assessment prior to installation and at set intervals after the equipment repaired is put back in service. The main objective of the risk assessment is to determine if the repair is fit for service.
    • Special care should be taken when sealing four bolt flanges. Loosening one bolt will significantly impact on the loading (compression) of the joint to the extent that containment may be lost. Tampering with these joints while under pressure is therefore not recommended. Assess the risks of toxic emission from leaking joints and take the necessary precautionary safety measures.
    • All temporary repairs shall be removed at the next opportunity in line with the unit turnaround cycle and any decision to deviate from the above shall be risk based assessed and signed off by the turnaround steering committee.

Contact [email protected] to discuss your project.

Share this post

Improving Mechanical Integrity

Strong inspection programs don’t happen by chance—they are built on intentional strategies that keep teams motivated, focused, and effective.

The following practices highlight how to strengthen your inspection organization, improve decision-making, and create a culture where inspectors are proactive, collaborative, and results-driven.

    • Develop and be proactive with your inspector career ladder. This will keep your inspection team hugely motivated. People want to grow!
      Have an ongoing risk based inspection (RBI) program. You can reference my book “Implementing and Evergreening RBI in Process Plants” for tips on this topic.
    • Have an RBI inspection – fitness for service (FFS) model organization. Key is to have RBI & FFS assessment capability within the inspection organization. This improves decision making quality and speed as it will encourage closer collaboration between the inspectors, corrosion and fitness for service engineers.
    • Do not track how many inspections you are doing. Track how many finds per inspection you are achieving—like a batting average but for inspectors. This will force the inspectors to do an RBI assessment and understand what to look for; how (inspection technique), where to inspect and how frequent to inspect, all before going to the field.
    • Celebrate when your inspection team makes a find requiring a repair. At one of the refineries where I worked, the inspection team had a large bell that they would ring each time an inspector found an issue; this helped foster the right culture.
    • Concentrate on your piping. At least 90% of your efforts should go to piping because in process facilities piping holds over 90% of the square footage of metal that is prone to corrosion.
    • Implement piping alert and retirement thickness criteria. A typical example is using one-tenth of an inch as the threshold value that triggers an assessment and the scheduling of monitoring and repairs. This would vary depending on the diameter of the pipe, however, there must be a minimum below which action must be taken and the minimum must not be dictated by the maximum allowable or operating pressure. If you use the maximum allowable or operating pressure you may end up justifying a thickness of 1/20 of an inch or less, simply not enough metal left to corrode and will likely develop a leak while you justify postponing a repair.
    • Enforce a sitewide policy of no overdue Inspections. It can get out of hand if you do not control this.
    • Have a dedicated leak reduction plan, including monthly or bi-weekly meetings and leak metrics reviewed by the site leadership team monthly. This focuses the site on the real target: leak reduction. Track inspectable process leaks and fires and use as both leading and lagging indicators.
    • Have a dedicated team be proactive at fixing upon finding signs of deterioration. The team should be hovering around the site with planned work. Limit these fixes to cleaning, use of coatings, grease, easy repairs of insulation. Anything more should follow the permit and planning process.

Contact [email protected] to discuss your project.

Share this post